This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
notes:comporg:projects:pnc2 [2018/02/08 12:54] – [Kevin Todd (ktodd3)] ktodd3 | notes:comporg:projects:pnc2 [2018/02/11 16:50] (current) – [Benjamin Schultes PNC1:] wedge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
As shown in the graph and chart, the C implemented pncs destroyed the other languages in runtime. Compiling with gccO3 gave the best performance in terms of runtime performance. It can be concluded that the lower-level language outperformed the higher-level languages in terms of runtime and qty. | As shown in the graph and chart, the C implemented pncs destroyed the other languages in runtime. Compiling with gccO3 gave the best performance in terms of runtime performance. It can be concluded that the lower-level language outperformed the higher-level languages in terms of runtime and qty. | ||
- | ===Benjamin Schultes PNC1: === | + | ====Benjamin Schultes PNC1:==== |
===All Scripts=== | ===All Scripts=== | ||
- | [[notes: | + | {{:notes: |
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
As expected, the C programs outperformed all other scripts. There isn't a lot of data shown on the chart because many of the C programs had very similar run times. | As expected, the C programs outperformed all other scripts. There isn't a lot of data shown on the chart because many of the C programs had very similar run times. | ||
Line 193: | Line 200: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ===Christian Cattell pnc2=== | + | ====Christian Cattell pnc2==== |