User Tools

Site Tools


irc:survey

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
irc:survey [2011/02/13 14:55] wedgeirc:survey [2011/02/22 18:58] (current) wedge
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP round gray box>
 +\\ 
 +\\ 
 +<WRAP centeralign bigger>**IRC Tenure/Promotion process survey**</WRAP>
 +\\ 
 +\\ 
 +
 +<WRAP round bggreen box>
 +<form>
 +Action mail ly012551@corning-cc.edu
 +Thanks "Thank you. Your submission has been received."
 +
 +Fieldset "Please rate the following statements:"
 +Select "Rate your overall satisfaction with the Tenure/Promotion process:" "Very Dissatisfied|Dissatisfied|Neutral|Satisfied|Very Satisfied" !
 +Select "Rate your satisfaction with the current vitae format:" "Very Dissatisfied|Dissatisfied|Neutral|Satisfied|Very Satisfied" !
 +Select "Rate your satisfaction with current Tenure/Promotion process descriptions and guidelines that are available as resources to you:" "Very Dissatisfied|Dissatisfied|Neutral|Satisfied|Very Satisfied" !
 +Select "When and if the promotion packet is modified, what level of involvement would you choose?" "None|Minimal|Don't Care|Active|Very Active" !
 +fieldset "Peer Review"
 +Select "Do you feel peer review has a place in the Tenure/Promotion process?" "Yes|No" !
 +fieldset "Division/College means"
 +Static "The Division/College mean values on SRTI forms are not used for promotion/tenure purposes."
 +Select "Would you be in favor of having those values removed from the SRTI summary reports?" "Yes|No" !
 +Static "SRTI = Student Reaction to Instructor"
 +fieldset "Additional comments"
 +Textarea "Please comment regarding suggested improvements to the Tenure/Promotion process:"
 +
 +submit "Submit"
 +
 +</form>
 +\\ 
 +</WRAP>
 +<WRAP centeralign>All submissions will be anonymous. Thank you for your time in helping us with this issue.</WRAP>
 +\\
 +\\
 +Instructional Resources Committee 
 +\\ 
 +</WRAP>