Implement a puzzle game that uses doubly-linked queues and during gameplay applies the use of bitwise or set logic to progress or succeed in the game.

This is part 2 of 3. You do not have to finish the game this week, instead, aim to complete the second third, submitting your current snapshot. More functionality than last week, but doesn’t need to be finished at this point.

Implement program in Vircon32 C, that:

• implements a block-based puzzle game, in the vein of Dr. Mario or Tetris, that:
  • incorporates some direct gameplay application of bitwise logic or set logic in the game progression and success.
  • game should (eventually) be polished, with intuitive controls, sound effects, music, and a functional, consistent gameplay.

You will want to go here to edit and fill in the various sections of the document:

• https://lab46.g7n.org/notes/fall2024/projects/magX

To be successful in this project, the following criteria (or their equivalent) must be met:

• Project must be submit on time, by the deadline.
  • Late submissions will lose 33% credit per day, with the submission window closing on the 3rd day following the deadline.
• Executed programs must display in a manner similar to provided output
  • output formatted, where applicable, must match that of project requirements
• Processing must be correct based on input given and output requested
• Output, if applicable, must be correct based on values input
• Code must be nicely and consistently indented
• Code must be consistently written, to strive for readability from having a consistent style throughout
• Code must be commented
  • Any “to be implemented” comments MUST be removed
    • these “to be implemented” comments, if still present at evaluation time, will result in points being deducted.
    • Sufficient comments explaining the point of provided logic MUST be present
• No global variables (without instructor approval), no goto statements, no calling of main()!
• Track/version the source code in your lab46 semester repository
• Submit a copy of your source code to me using the submit tool by the deadline.

Let's say you have completed work on the project, and are ready to submit, you would do the following:

lab46:~/src/SEMESTER/DESIG/PROJECT$ submit DESIG PROJECT file1 file2 file3 ... fileN

You should get some sort of confirmation indicating successful submission if all went according to plan. If not, check for typos and or locational mismatches.

I'll be evaluating the project based on the following criteria:

572:mag1:final tally of results (572/572)
*:mag1:code, XML, build script, and cartridge submitted [104/104]
*:mag1:implements and functionally utilizes doubly linked queues [104/104]
*:mag1:some aspect of progress captured on our way toward mag2 [104/104]
*:mag1:screenshots, video produced showing aspects of game runtime [104/104]
*:mag1:screenshots, video posted to discord channel [104/104]
*:mag1:committed to lab46 semester repo [52/52]

• each class member is to participate in the contribution of relevant information and formatting of the documentation
  • minimal member contributions consist of:
    • near the class average edits (a value of at least four productive edits)
    • near the average class content change average (a value of at least 1024 bytes (absolute value of data content change))
    • no zero-sum commits (adding in one commit then later removing in its entirety for the sake of satisfying edit requirements)
  • adding and formatting data in an organized fashion, aiming to create an informative and readable document that anyone in the class can reference
  • content contributions will be factored into a documentation coefficient, a value multiplied against your actual project submission to influence the end result:
    • no contributions, co-efficient is 0.50
    • less than minimum contributions is 0.75
    • met minimum contribution threshold is 1.00

• Solutions not abiding by spirit of project will be subject to a 50% overall deduction
• Solutions not utilizing descriptive why and how comments will be subject to a 25% overall deduction
• Solutions not utilizing indentation to promote scope and clarity or otherwise maintaining consistency in code style and presentation will be subject to a 25% overall deduction
• Solutions not organized and easy to read (assume a terminal at least 90 characters wide, 40 characters tall) are subject to a 25% overall deduction