This is an old revision of the document!
The baseline qualifications for taking this course include:
With the advent of commercially-viable and desktop-usable AI products (AI/AGI/chatGPT/LLM/etc.), heretofore all regarded as “AI”, questions of ethics and allowability of such tools in the learning process have become a rather hot topic. For the purposes of my classes:
* aim to understand and know how to do things yourself. This allows you to better vet AI output.
* aim to, during this learning process, do as much of the task as you can by hand or mentally: this is how you gain understanding and comprehension. This allows you to better vet AI output. * if you insist on using AI: * please limit it to "what" queries * do not try to use AI to perform "how" and "why" queries. YOU need to figured out and understand how to do things, YOU are the student. YOU letting an AI come up with your solutions is a detriment * accept that you are putting yourself at risk of deeply sabotaging your learning journey, subjecting yourself to stagnant thought and limited perspectives, as you insulate yourself from the rigors of doing the actual work * accept that, if you pass off AI-generated work as your own, and your work is questioned, if you are unable to competently demonstrate your understanding, you risk losing any and all credit for that deliverable * accept that you will have to live with the awareness that the instructor and other suitably aware individuals in the course may lose some faith in your humanity * increasing focus and study on the accuracy of AI, when not vetted by a sound foundational understanding, results in significant error and incorrectness being introduced into the work * AI prose is increasingly sophisticated and convincing. Yet there is a difference between verbosity and competence. Learning to differentiate between them is a valuable life skill, and an important ability to have when dealing with AI output.