User Tools

Site Tools


haas:spring2015:cprog:projects:afn0

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
haas:spring2015:cprog:projects:afn0 [2015/02/23 22:15] – created wedgehaas:spring2015:cprog:projects:afn0 [2015/03/20 20:45] (current) – [Prerequisites/Corequisites] wedge
Line 15: Line 15:
  
   * can perform this trick in your head/by hand (if you can't do it on your own, you have no business trying to tell the computer how to do it)   * can perform this trick in your head/by hand (if you can't do it on your own, you have no business trying to tell the computer how to do it)
-  * understand the pattern/process to doing it for any length number (2-digit through 24-digdt)+  * understand the pattern/process to doing it for any length number (2-digit through 18-digdt)
   * ability to deploy loops to simplify your process   * ability to deploy loops to simplify your process
   * ability to use arrays to facilitate the storage of your processed values   * ability to use arrays to facilitate the storage of your processed values
Line 61: Line 61:
 The answer is: **071426043986547** The answer is: **071426043986547**
  
-====loops==== 
-A loop is basically instructing the computer to repeat a section, or block, or code a given amount of times (it can be based on a fixed value-- repeat this 4 times, or be based on a conditional value-- keep repeating as long as (or while) this value is not 4). 
  
-Loops enable us to simplify our code-- allowing us to write a one-size-fits all algorithm (provided the algorithm itself can appropriately scale!), where the computer merely repeats the instructions we gave. We only have to write them once, but the computer can do that task any number of times.+=====Task===== 
 +The task at hand can benefit from loop and array assistance.
  
-Loops can be initially difficult to comprehend because unlike other programmatic actionsthey are not single-state in nature-- loops are multi-state. What this means is that in order to correctly "see" or visualize loop, you must analyze what is going on with EACH iteration, watching the values/algorithm/process slowly march from its initial state to its resultant state. Think of it as climbing a set of stairs... yes, we can describe that action succinctly as "climbing a set of stairs", but there are multiple "steps" (heh, heh) involved: we place our foot, adjust our balance-- left foot, right foot, from one step, to the next, to the next, allowing us to progress from the bottom step to the top step... that process of scaling a stairway is the same as iterating through a loop.+For instancetaking the number input and processing it so each digit occupies its own array element would facilate your efforts in the overall task-- a process strongly resembling some of the work you had to do in the **mbe1** project to get your input ready for the multiply by 11 activity.
  
-With that saidit is important to be able to focus on the process of the individual steps being taken. What is involved in taking a step? What constitutes a basic unit of stairway traversal? If that unit can be easily repeated for the next and the next (and in fact, the rest of the) stepswe've described the core process of the loop, or what will be iterated a given number of times.+=====Functions===== 
 +As indicatedthis task shares many attributes with the **mbe1** project; in fact, the mental math process itself may be slightly simpler. That affords us the opportunity to introduce and learn about further programming optimizationswithout the concurrent burden of new concepts.
  
-In C and C-derived languages, we typically have 3 loops:+Specifically, we will look at modularizing aspects of our solution, using functions, to make for a cleaner, more organized codebase.
  
-  for loop (automatic counter loop, stepping loop- when we know exactly how many times we wish something to run; we know where we want to start, where we want to end, and exactly how to progress from start to end (step value) +We've been using functions all along (everytime you use **fprintf()** or **fscanf()**, for instance), but the value is not just in using pre-existing onesbut also in making our own to use.
-  while loop (top-driven conditional loop- when we want to repeat a process, but the exact number of iterations is either not known, or not important. While loops can run 0 or more times. +
-  * do-while loop (bottom-driven conditional loop) - similar to the while looponly we do the check for loop termination at the bottom of the loop, meaning it runs 1 or more times (a do-while loop is guaranteed to run at least once).+
  
-===for loops=== +====Function prototype==== 
-A for loop is the most syntactically unique of the loopsso care must be taken to use the proper syntax.+Like variablesfunctions need to be declared.
  
-With any loopwe need (at least onelooping variable, which the loop will use to analyze whether or not we've met our looping destinationor to perform another iteration.+We can declare them at various scopes (file/globalblock/local)... if you wish for the function to be accessible by all functions within a programyou will want to declare it with a global scope.
  
-A for loop typically also has defined starting point, "keep-looping-while" condition, and a stepping equation.+If particular function is only to be used by specific function, and no others, you can opt to declare it local scope (ie within the function that will be calling it).
  
-Here'sample for loopin C, which will display the squares of each number, starting at 0, and stepping one at time, for 8 total iterations:+A function is basically module or subroutine. It is a mini-programfocusing on the performing of a particular process.
  
-<code c> +Like a program, it takes input, does processing, and provides output.
-int i = 0;+
  
-for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) +Unlike a programits input may not come from the keyboardbut instead from particular variablesand may not send output to the screen, but instead channel output in a way that it can be stored into a variable.
-+
-    fprintf(stdout"loop #%d ... %d\n"(i+1)(i*i)); +
-+
-</code>+
  
-The output of this codewith the help of our loop should be:+This distinctions asidea function can in many ways be viewed as a micro- or sub-program/routine. We use functions to assist us in making our code more readable/organized/navigable.
  
-<cli> +Keeping everything in ONE file, ONE big function in that one file, is rather monolithicIn time, with sufficiently large programs, such an arrangement would become a tad unwieldySo functions help to keep our focus short yet attentive.
-loop #1 ... +
-loop #2 ... 1 +
-loop #3 ... 4 +
-loop #4 ... 9 +
-loop #5 ... 16 +
-loop #6 ... 25 +
-loop #7 ... 36 +
-loop #8 ... 49 +
-</cli>+
  
-Note how we can use our looping variable (**i**within mathematical expressions to drive process along... loops can be of enormous help in this way.+To create a function we must first declare (or prototypeit. This needs to happen BEFORE said function is ever used (just as with variables- you must declare variable before it is first used, otherwise the compiler yells).
  
-And againwe shouldn't look at this as one step-- we need to see there are 8 discretedistinct steps happening here (when i is 0, when i is 1, when i is 2, ... up until i is 7).+A functionin many waysis like a programmable variable (or is a variable with programming attached).
  
-The loop exits once **i** reaches a value of 8because our loop determinant condition states as long as **i** is **less than** **8**, continue to loop. Once **i** becomes **8**, our looping condition has been satisfied, and the loop will no longer iterate.+As such, it has return value of a type (the function's output)a name, and parameters (input).
  
-The stepping (that thirdfield is mathematical expression indicating how we wish for **i** to progress from its starting state (of being equal to 0) to satisfying the loop's iterating condition (no longer being less than 8).+We see this with main()... here are two variations of a **main()** function declaration (technically also the start of the definition as well, in the case of **main()**):
  
-**i++** is a shortcut we can use in C; the longhand (and likely more familiar) equivalent is: **i i + 1** +===Parameterless function===
- +
-===while loops==+
-A while loop isn't as specific about starting and stepping values, really only caring about what condition needs to be met in order to exit the loop (keep looping while this condition is true). +
- +
-In actuality, anything we use a for loop for can be expressed as a while loop-- we merely have to ensure we provide the necessary loop variables and progressions within the loop. +
- +
-That same loop above, expressed as a while loop, could look like:+
  
 <code c> <code c>
-int i = 0; +int main()
- +
-while (i < 8) +
-+
-    fprintf(stdout, "loop #%d ... %d\n", (i+1), (i*i)); +
-    i = i + 1;   // I could have used "i++;" here +
-}+
 </code> </code>
  
-The output of this code should be identicaleven though we used different loop to accomplish the task (try them both out and confirm!)+In this example, we see the declaration of main() where it has return value of **int**, meaning, upon completion, main() will return a value corresponding with an int data type (also in main()'s case, being the first function run, we tend to return a status code to the operating system-- 0 for success, non-zero for some sort of error or deferred success).
  
-While loopslike for loopswill run 0 or more times; if the conditions enabling the loop to occur are not initially met, they will not run... if metthey will continue to iterate until their looping conditions are met.+main()in this casetakes no parameters (just an empty set of parenthesis)... due to thiswe refer to this function as a parameterless function. A function without parameters. Without input.
  
-It is possible to introduce certain kind of **logical error** into your programs using loops-- what is known as an "infinite loop"; this is basically where you erroneously provide incorrect conditions to the particular loop usedallowing it to start running, but never arriving at its conclusionthereby iterative forever.+Now: this is technically different form of input and output than you are used to. Input doesn't ALWAYS have to come from the keyboardnor does output ALWAYS have to go to the screen. Input instead is desired informating being acquired for the process at handand output is the byproduct of performing the operation. Sometimes this means keyboard input and screen output- but not always.
  
-Another common **logical error** that loops will allow us to encounter will be the "off by one" error-- where the conditions we pose to the loop are incorrectand the loop runs one more or one less time than we had planned. Againproper debugging of our code will resolve this situation.+Additionallywith or without parameters, we can always perform additional input (and output) within a given functionthrough the use of various input and output methods (like **fprintf()/fscanf()**).
  
-===do-while loops=== +===Parametered function===
-The third commonly recognized looping structure in C, the do-while loop is identical to the while (and therefore the for) loop, only it differs in where it checks the looping condition: where **for** and **while** are "top-driven" loops (ie the test for loop continuance occurs at the top of the loop), the **do-while** is a "bottom-driven" loop (ie the test for loop continuance occurs at the bottom of the loop). +
- +
-The placement of this test determines the minimal number of times a loop can run. +
- +
-In the case of the for/while loops, because the test is at the top- if the looping conditions are not met, the loop may not run at all. It is for this reason why these loops can run "0 or more times" +
- +
-For the do-while loop, because the test occurs at the bottom, the body of the loop (one full iteration) is run before the test is encountered. So even if the conditions for looping are not met, a do-while will run "1 or more times"+
- +
-That may seem like a minor, and possibly annoying, difference, but in nuanced algorithm design, such distinctions can drastically change the layout of your code, potentially being the difference between beautifully elegant-looking solutions and slightly more hackish. They can BOTH be used to solve the same problems, it is merely the nature of how we choose express the solution that should make one more preferable over the other in any given moment. +
- +
-I encourage you to intentionally try your hand at converting your loops between for/while/do-while in your programs (regardless of how ugly it may make your code), so you can get more familiar with how to structure your solutions and express them in a given type of loop. You will find you tend to think in a certain way (from experience, we seem to get in the habit of thinking "top-driven", and as we're unsure, we tend to exert far more of a need to control the situation, so we tend to want to use **for** loops for everything-- but practicing the others will free your mind to craft more elegant and efficient solutions; but only if you take the time to play and explore these possibilities). +
- +
-So, expressing that same program in the form of a do-while loop (note the changes from the while):+
  
 <code c> <code c>
-int i = 0; +int main(int argcchar **argv)
- +
-do { +
-    fprintf(stdout"loop #%d ... %d\n", (i+1), (i*i)); +
-    i = i + 1;  // again, we could just as easily use "i++;" here +
-} while(i < 8);+
 </code> </code>
  
-In this case, the 0 or more vs. 1 or more minimal iterations wasn't important; the difference is purely syntactical.+In this case, our **main()** function actually takes parameters- two, in fact:
  
-With the do-while loop, we start the loop with a **do** statement (feel free to put the opening brace on the next line as we have all along-- I'm also demonstrating another style of brace placement).+  an integer, we are calling **argc** 
 +  a double pointer, we are calling **argv**
  
-Also, the do-while is the only one of our loops which NEEDS a terminating semi-colon (**;**).. please take note of this.+This function takes two parameterstwo pieces of input, available to us in the form of variables, by those names, of those typesWe make use of them as we need to in accomplishing the program at hand.
  
-====arrays==== +So, when we wish to create functions of our own, we need:
-The other important component of our **mbe1** project will involve the effective use of arrays to further aid us in having an efficient (and very importantlyscalable) solution to our problem.+
  
-An array is basically just a collection of variables. Where before we'd declare a separate variable for each number we'd wish to store, an array lets us have but one variable name, but multiple storage location (like PO Boxes-- they're all located at the same "place", the post officebut there are multiple boxes for storing individual values). Addressing/location of information can be greatly simplified through the use of arrays.+  * the return type 
 +  * the function name 
 +  * 0 or more parametersidentifying their order and type
  
-An array is what is known as **homogeneous** composite data type. It technically is a modifier (or adjective, if you willof any valid variable data typeWe basically use it to say "I'll take X of these", and slap one name on all of them.+For example, let us make sum() functionHere would be a likely prototype (we'd place it above main()):
  
-**homogeneous** means all of the same, indicating it can ONLY contain variables of the exact same type (such as only **int**egersonly **short int**egers, only **float**s, only **char**s, etc.)... composite indicates "made up of various parts or elements", or that it is a "container"... it is like a pack of Necco wafers... when you think about it, a pack of Necco wafers ONLY contains necco wafers. You don't see a necco wafer, a pez, an M&M, etc. you ONLY see Necco wafers in a pack of Necco wafers... therefore, a pack of Necco wafers is the same as our array being described (in concept). +<code> 
- +int sum(int *, int);
-An array has a few other requirements: +
- +
-  * its size, once declared, remains constant (you cannot say you'd like a 4 element array and then later ask to double or halve it--- there is no such thing as "dynamic" arrays or array resizing... even languages that claim to have it, they are lying to you (they are declaring a new array in the background to your altered specifications, copying over all the values, and then presenting that copy as your array)). +
-  * arrays are located by their name (just as any variable is), along with an address/index/offset (which mailbox, or position of necco wafer in the pack). +
-  * arrays start at an offset of 0. +
-  * arrays can be expressed as a pointer (I tend to treat them as pointers), and there's this "bracket notation" we commonly see which is actually trying to hide the pointery truth from you. +
-  * C cannot perform global operations on arrays-- you must transact on an array one element at a time (this is the case with all languages, although some will cheat and do the work behind-the-scenes, making you think it is possible, when really they are casting illusions). +
- +
-===Declaring a 4 element integer array=== +
-Let us see our array in action: +
- +
-<code c> +
-int numbers[4];+
 </code> </code>
  
-This code will declare new variable, of type **int**, called **numbers**... the brackets indicate we are allocating **four** consecutive **int**-sized units that will be associated with this variable called **numbers**... that is**numbers** is a post office with 4 mailboxes, addressed 0, 1, 2, 3 (0-3 is 4 distinct values).+A function prototype (vs. its definition) will have terminating semi-colonas you see above.
  
-To access the first boxwe access the **0** offset; the second box is right next to the first, at offset **1** (it is one int away from the first one). Similar with the third and fourth.+In our caseour sum() function has the following:
  
-To place a **17** in the first (position **0**) element of our **numbers** arraywe'd say the following:+  * return type of **int** (particular variable name doesn't matter, type does) 
 +  the function's name (sum) 
 +  a comma-separated list of types corresponding to the parameters (againvariable names do not matter, but the type is important).
  
-<code c> +Our sum() function will take an integer array (denoted by the int pointer above), and a size (the second, regular int).
-numbers[0] = 17; +
-</code>+
  
-To place a **36** in the third (position **2**) element of our **numbers** array, we'd say:+Now, parameter order very much matters. In our case, an "int *" came firstfollowed by an "int"... we need to be mindful of this order to successfully call and use the function.
  
-<code c> +====Function definition==== 
-numbers[2] 36; +While a function prototype is technically optional (you can put the definition in place of the prototype-- we just often use prototypes to further allow organization), we MUST have a function definition. This is nothing short of the code that dictates what operations the function in question will perform.
-</code>+
  
-===Using variables as our array index position=== +Our sum() function will be defined (below the main() function) as follows:
-Because the array index is a number, and things like **int**s are numbers, we can also specify the array location via a variable. To wit, we will assign a 52 to the fourth array element, but do so via an **index** variable we set up:+
  
 <code c> <code c>
-int index = 3; +int sum(int *array, int size)
-numbers[index] = 52; +
-</code> +
- +
-Because **index** contains a 3, we're telling the computer we wish to put a 52 in the array element indicated in the **index** variable (the fourth element). +
- +
-===Using variables for array contents=== +
-As wellbecause we are putting values in our array elements that conform to particular data types, we can use variables there as well (in this case, put a 96 into the second array element-- using variables to store both the index and the value): +
- +
-<code c> +
-int value = 96; +
-int index = 1; +
- +
-numbers[index] = value; +
-</code> +
- +
-Hopefully these examples have proved useful with respect to basic concepts and syntactic usage of arrays. +
- +
-We now explore the productive collaboration of arrays and loops: +
- +
-====Using loops and arrays together for universal harmony==== +
- +
-To really make the most out of arrays in scaling our algorithms, using them in conjunction with loops gives us the most bang for our buck. The advantage of arrays+loops is that with the ONE consistent variable name, representing many NUMERICALLY-identifiable elements, we can work with ranges of data sets without the need to make tons of exceptions for each possible use case (worst case we just make an array of the maximum expected size, and only use what we need)+
- +
-===42 everywhere=== +
- +
-To illustrate, here we will declare an 11 element array (called **data**), and fill each element with the value 42 using a for loop: +
- +
-<code c> +
-int data[11], position = 0; +
- +
-for(position = 0; position < 11; position=position+1) // see, using long form, could have done "position++"+
 { {
-    data[position= 42;+    int result = 0; 
 +    int i = 0; 
 +     
 +    for (i = 0; i < size; i++) 
 +        result = result + array[i]
 +         
 +    return(result);
 } }
 </code> </code>
  
-===Display array contents=== +====function calling==== 
-What if we wanted to print the contents of the array? Once again, we use a loop, and print out each valueone at a time.+Once we've declared (prototyped) and defined our functionnow all we have to do is use it! When you make use of functionwe refer to it as //calling//. We call the function, by name, providing and required parametersand capturing any return value as we see fit.
  
-Important considerations: +Here would be an example of calling the above-mentioned **sum()** function:
-  * again, with C, being true to how the computer actually works, we can only access the array one element at a time +
-  because we know array indices start at 0, we have a known starting point +
-  because we know how big our array is (11 elements, from previous example), we know how many elements to go for +
-  * each element is located one after the other-- 0 is followed by 1 is followed by 2 etc. +
- +
-... therefore, we have all the ingredients for a **for** loop:+
  
 <code c> <code c>
-for (position = 0; position < 11; position++) +int scores[4]; 
-+int tally = 0;
-    fprintf(stdout, "%d ", data[position])+
-+
-fprintf(stdout, "\n") // what important role does this line play? +
-</code>+
  
-This should result in the following program output:+scores[0] = 88; 
 +scores[1] = 47; 
 +scores[2] = 96; 
 +scores[3] = 73;
  
-<cli> +tally sum(scores4);
-42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42  +
-</cli> +
- +
-===Backwards?=== +
-What if we wanted to display the contents of our array in reverse (from position 10 to position 9, to 8, down to 0)? +
- +
-We'd still want to use a loop, but look at how we structure it: +
- +
-<code c> +
-for (position = 10; position >= 0; position--) +
-+
-    fprintf(stdout, "%d ", data[position]); +
-+
-fprintf(stdout"\n");  // what important role does this line play?+
 </code> </code>
  
-Notice how the loop-terminating relational statements differ (comparing the two-- for forward and backwarddoes it make sense?), and also how we progress between individual elements (in one we are incrementing, in this recent one we are decrementing). +Note, that it is rather important to match the type and order of parametersDue to the nature of the array (especially the form of array declarationusedcertain pointer-related details are being hidden from usgiving somewhat of false impressionFurther discussion about pointers will begin to shed light on that.
- +
-That should make sense before you try to proceed. +
- +
-===Thinking with arrays=== +
-Using arrays in your algorithms represents a potential barrier you have to overcome. Up until this point, we've been getting used to labelling all our variables with unique, individual names. +
- +
-Now, with arrays, we have one common name, distinguishable by its element offset. That has been known to cause some conceptual problems due to the mildly abstract nature it creates. It would certainly not hurt to draw some pictures and manually work through some examples, step-by-step... it may be confusing at first, but the more you play with it, ask questions, play, read, etc., the sooner things will start to click. +
- +
-As some of you have started to realize with **mbe0**, the actual core work of the project wasn't actually that hard, once you saw through the illusion of complexity we had placed in front of it. By using arrays, we can make our solutions even easier (and code even simpler)... but, we will initially have to eliminate self-imposed mental obstacles making the problem appear significantly more difficult than it actually is+
- +
- +
-====Multiplying a number (of varying digits) by 11==== +
-In **mbe0**, we specifically looked at 3 usage cases for our mental math problem: 1-, 2-, and 3-digit number. I limited it to those because, lacking arrays and loops for that project, the code would have gotten impossibly long and complex, plus: I wanted you to focus on the basics of variable usage and if-statements. +
- +
-Now that we have those down, we can now apply arrays and loops to optimize and enhance a solution, and to allow it to scale to a wider range of possibilities (why limit ourselves to just 1-, 2-, and 3-digit values? Once we see the pattern, we can apply this to 4-, 5-, 6-digit numbers and beyond). +
- +
-===3-digits (review)=== +
-Again, to review, let's look at a 3-digit example. 123 x 11: +
- +
-<code> +
-123 x 11 = 1       (1 + 2) (2 + 3) 3 +
-         = (1 + 0) (3 + 0) 5        (what are those + 0's? Carry values.) +
-         = 1                   3 +
-         = 1353 +
-</code> +
- +
-And digit-based additions that generate a carry are similarly propagated. +
- +
-567 x 11: +
- +
-<code> +
-567 x 11 = 5       (5 + 6) (6 + 7) 7 +
-         = (5)+1   (11)+1  (13)+0  7  the outside numbers are the carry values +
-         = 6                   7 +
-         = 6237 +
-</code> +
- +
-When doing this, we need to evaluate the number from right to left (just as we would do it if we were to compute it purely mathematically by hand): +
- +
-  * We know the last digit (1s place) of 567 x 11 right off the bat: 7 +
-  * The second digit (10s place) is the sum of 6 and 7 (6+7which is 13 (sum of 3carry of 1), so: 3 +
-  * The third digit (100s place) is the sum of 5 and 6 plus any carry from the 10s place (which is 1), so (5+6+1) which is 12 (sum of 2, carry of 1), so: 2 +
-  * The fourth digit (1000s place) is the original first value (5 of the 567) plus any carry from the 100s place (which there is, a 1), so (5+1) which yields a sum of 6, carry of 0. +
- +
-A dual benefit of this project is that in addition to extending your programming experience / understanding of C, you could develop this as a mental ability (that is where it originated), and you could then use it as a means of checking your work. +
- +
-===4-digits=== +
-Now let us process a 4-digit example (look for similarities to the 3-digit process, specifically how this is merely an expansion, or an additional step-- due to the additional digit): +
- +
-4567 x 11: +
- +
-<code> +
-4567 x 11 = 4       (4 + 5) (5  + 6) (6 + 7) 7 +
-          = (4)+1   (9)+1   (11)+1   (13)+0  7   the numbers outside are the carry +
-          = 5                    3       7 +
-          = 50237 +
-</code> +
- +
-Remember, we are processing this from right to left (so that the carry values can properly propagate). While there is no initial carry coming inwe'll add one anyway (0), so we see 13+0 (which is simply 13)... but because we're interested in place values, this is actually sum of 3, carry of 1... and that one gets sent over to the next place (which has an 11)... so 11+1 will be 12, or sum of 2, carry 1... that carry will propagate to the next position to the left (the 9)... so there's a rippling effect taking place (math in action). +
- +
-Can you see how "the same" this process for 4-digit numbers is when comparing to the process for 3-digit numbers? And how the same comparison can be made for 2-digit, and 5-digit, 6-digit, etc.? Please take some time, working through some examples (by hand) to identify and notice the pattern, or essence, of this process. You need to see how it doesn't matter in the long run how many digits- because you're doing the same thing (just a different number of times).+
  
-That "different number of times" will be based on the length of the number... could that be used to help us? 
  
-(Also, the potential exception here would possibly be 1-digit values... if you cannot easily find a way to make 1-digit numbers work with greater-than-1-digit numbers, that's where an if-statement would come into play-- if 1-digit, do this specific process, else do the regular process). I'm not saying one universal solution isn't possible, but at this stage of your structured programming development, such solutions may take a bit more work (and that's okay). 
 =====Program===== =====Program=====
-It is your task to write an optimized version of your multiply by eleven program that will use arrays and loops to enable you to enhance and expand the functional capabilities of your program. No longer will you be limited by 1-2-, or 3-digit numbers, but you will be able to input up to 8-digit numbers and have your program successfully determine the result (and 8 is merely an arbitrary value I picked, you should easily be able to up it to the tens of thousands and experience no change in functionality-- actually, our 8-digit limit is considering a data type limitation... the maximum size of an int: **signed int**s can have a maximum value of 2.4 billionso unless we change to a different data type (or different method of inputting the source number)this will be our limitation.+It is your task to write program that obtains a long integer value from the user, and processes that single value into separate array elements (one digit per array element). Determining the number of digitsyou are to perform this "all from nine, last from ten" subtraction method on the number using array transactionsdisplaying a visual representation of the problem being solved to STDOUT.
  
 Your program should: Your program should:
   * obtain its input from STDIN.   * obtain its input from STDIN.
-    * input should be in the form of a single integer value+    * input should be in the form of a single (long) long integer value (you want a 64-bit data type)
   * determine the number of digits of the inputted value (store this in a variable)   * determine the number of digits of the inputted value (store this in a variable)
-  * perform the correct algorithm against the input +  * process that input long integer into separate array elements- one digit per element. 
-  * propagate any carries +    * you may assume a maximum array size of the maximum number of digits you're theoretically able to input that can be stored in a 64-bit value. 
-  * use an array (**digit**) to store individual digits from the number input +  * perform the "all from nine, the last from ten" operation on the array, storing the result in another array. 
-  * use another array (**result**) to store the digits of the result number, following manipulations +  * display the problem being solved, along with the answer 
-    * hint: you will want to make the **result** array one element largerWhy is this? +  * use functions to modularize your code: 
-  Display output showing aspects of the process (see example execution below) +    * have an **longint2array()** function that takes the long int, and returns an array (the function itself handles the processing of splitting up the long int into individual digits). 
-  output the final value (by iterating through the array, displaying one value at a time)+    * have a **printarray()** function, whose responsibility it is to display the indicated array to STDOUT
 +    have a **allfromnine()** function that takes the source array, does the processing, and returns ther result array.
  
-=====Execution===== +I might suggest the following function prototypes:
-Several operating behaviors are shown as examples.+
  
-An eight digit value:+<code c> 
 +unsigned char *longint2array(unsigned long int); 
 +void printarray(unsigned char *, unsigned char); 
 +unsigned char *allfromnine(unsigned char *); 
 +</code>
  
-<cli> +Some questions to contemplate:
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1$ ./mbe1 +
-Enter value: 31415926 +
-Digits detected: 8+
  
-Obtaining unique digits, storing in array... +  * Why an array of unsigned chars when we're starting with a long (long) int? 
-digit[0] = 6 +    * Why is that the "best fit" size-wise? 
-digit[1] = 2 +    * Why will that not result in lost data? 
-digit[2] = 9 +  * Why unsigned? 
-digit[3] = 5 +    * What impact will that have on our input value's upper bound? 
-digit[4] = 1 +  * Why represent the size of the usable array as an unsigned char? 
-digit[5] = 4 +    * Why is this the "best fit" size-wise? 
-digit[6] +=====Execution===== 
-digit[7] +An example of your program in action:
- +
-Applying process... +
-result[0] 6 + 0 + 0 (sum of 6, carry out of 0) +
-result[1] 2 + 6 + 0 (sum of 8, carry out of 0) +
-result[2] 9 + 2 + 0 (sum of 1, carry out of 1) +
-result[3] 5 + 9 + 1 (sum of 5, carry out of 1) +
-result[4] 1 + 5 + 1 (sum of 7, carry out of 0) +
-result[5] 4 + 1 + 0 (sum of 5, carry out of 0) +
-result[6] 1 + 4 + 0 (sum of 5, carry out of 0) +
-result[7] 3 + 1 + 0 (sum of 4, carry out of 0) +
-result[8] = 3 + 0 + 0 (sum of 3, carry out of 0) +
- +
-Displaying result... +
-31415926 x 11 = 345575186 +
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1$  +
-</cli> +
- +
-Next, a four digit value:+
  
 <cli> <cli>
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1$ ./mbe1 +lab46:~/src/cprog/afn0$ ./afn0 
-Enter value: 7104 +Enter value: 31415926535897 
-Digits detected: 4+Digits detected: 14
  
-Obtaining unique digits, storing in array... + 100000000000000 
-digit[0] = 4 +- 31415926535897 
-digit[1] = 0 + --------------- 
-digit[2] = 1 +  68584073464102
-digit[3] = 7+
  
-Applying process... +lab46:~/src/cprog/afn0
-result[0] = 4 + 0 + 0 (sum of 4, carry out of 0) +
-result[1] = 0 + 4 + 0 (sum of 4, carry out of 0) +
-result[2] = 1 + 0 + 0 (sum of 1, carry out of 0) +
-result[3] = 7 + 1 + 0 (sum of 8, carry out of 0) +
-result[4] = 7 + 0 + 0 (sum of 7, carry out of 0) +
- +
-Displaying result... +
-7104 x 11 = 78144 +
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1+
 </cli> </cli>
- 
-Finally, a five digit value: 
- 
-<cli> 
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1$ ./mbe1 
-Enter value: 56789 
-Digits detected: 5 
- 
-Obtaining unique digits, storing in array... 
-digit[0] = 9 
-digit[1] = 8 
-digit[2] = 7 
-digit[3] = 6 
-digit[4] = 5 
- 
-Applying process... 
-result[0] = 9 + 0 + 0 (sum of 9, carry out of 0) 
-result[1] = 8 + 9 + 0 (sum of 7, carry out of 1) 
-result[2] = 7 + 8 + 1 (sum of 6, carry out of 1) 
-result[3] = 6 + 7 + 1 (sum of 4, carry out of 1) 
-result[4] = 5 + 6 + 1 (sum of 2, carry out of 1) 
-result[5] = 5 + 1 + 0 (sum of 6, carry out of 0) 
- 
-Displaying result... 
-56789 x 11 = 624679 
-lab46:~/src/cprog/mbe1$  
-</cli> 
- 
-The execution of the program is short and simple- obtain the input, do the processing, produce the output, and then terminate. 
  
 =====Submission===== =====Submission=====
Line 478: Line 253:
  
 <cli> <cli>
-$ submit cprog mbe1 mbe1.c +$ submit cprog afn0 afn0.c 
-Submitting cprog project "mbe1": +Submitting cprog project "afn0": 
-    -> mbe1.c(OK)+    -> afn0.c(OK)
  
 SUCCESSFULLY SUBMITTED SUCCESSFULLY SUBMITTED
haas/spring2015/cprog/projects/afn0.1424729757.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/02/23 22:15 (external edit)