User Tools

Site Tools


haas:spring2014:cprog:projects:dayofweek

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
haas:spring2014:cprog:projects:dayofweek [2014/02/06 17:32] – [Objective] wedgehaas:spring2014:cprog:projects:dayofweek [2014/02/06 17:39] (current) – [Reflection] wedge
Line 16: Line 16:
  
   * all requests will be for days in the 21st century (2000-2099)   * all requests will be for days in the 21st century (2000-2099)
-=====Prerequisites=====+=====Prerequisites/Corequisites=====
 In addition to the new skills required on previous projects, to successfully accomplish/perform this project, the listed resources/experiences need to be consulted/achieved: In addition to the new skills required on previous projects, to successfully accomplish/perform this project, the listed resources/experiences need to be consulted/achieved:
  
Line 41: Line 41:
 In our example, we're working with 2014, the last two digits are therefore: 14 In our example, we're working with 2014, the last two digits are therefore: 14
  
-You should be able to come up with a means of extracting this information.+You should be able to come up with a means of extracting this information in your program.
  
 ===Step 2: Compute 25% (drop the decimal)=== ===Step 2: Compute 25% (drop the decimal)===
Line 90: Line 90:
  
 Go and reference the 3 from that table... what day do we get? Does it match the actual day of the week for January 1st, 2014? Go and reference the 3 from that table... what day do we get? Does it match the actual day of the week for January 1st, 2014?
 +
 +<cli>
 +lab46:~$ cal 01 2014
 +    January 2014
 +Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
 +          1  2  3  4
 +  6  7  8  9 10 11
 +12 13 14 15 16 17 18
 +19 20 21 22 23 24 25
 +26 27 28 29 30 31
 +
 +lab46:~$ 
 +</cli>
  
 Pretty neat, eh? Pretty neat, eh?
Line 121: Line 134:
   * 2000 by definition isn't a leap year, but how does this algorithm work for 2000 in general?   * 2000 by definition isn't a leap year, but how does this algorithm work for 2000 in general?
   * Try this algorithm on some years in the 20th century and see how it fares.   * Try this algorithm on some years in the 20th century and see how it fares.
-    * Is it correct? Is it correct for all of them?+    * Is it correct? Is it correct for any of them?
     * If it isn't correct, is it consistently off by a value?     * If it isn't correct, is it consistently off by a value?
  
haas/spring2014/cprog/projects/dayofweek.1391707969.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/02/06 17:32 by wedge