This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
haas:fall2019:c4eng:projects:pctxinfo [2019/08/24 15:29] – [Less than number certainties] wedge | haas:fall2019:c4eng:projects:pctxinfo [2019/08/24 15:29] (current) – [Positive (greater than) number certainties] wedge | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
So, if we know that Z << X, we can ALSO infer that Y << X (we just don't know how Y relates to Z). | So, if we know that Z << X, we can ALSO infer that Y << X (we just don't know how Y relates to Z). | ||
+ | So unless we can find an example that violates this case, we can run with it as a viable approach to take in the letter division puzzles. Tell me: is there a valid combination that violates this? | ||
=====Less than number certainties===== | =====Less than number certainties===== | ||
Like the above, but inverted: what if we KNOW that the top number is less than one of the two numbers beneath it? Can we also infer some pattern? Let's see: | Like the above, but inverted: what if we KNOW that the top number is less than one of the two numbers beneath it? Can we also infer some pattern? Let's see: |