User Tools

Site Tools


haas:fall2019:c4eng:projects:pctxinfo

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
haas:fall2019:c4eng:projects:pctxinfo [2019/08/24 15:29] – [Less than number certainties] wedgehaas:fall2019:c4eng:projects:pctxinfo [2019/08/24 15:29] (current) – [Positive (greater than) number certainties] wedge
Line 117: Line 117:
 So, if we know that Z << X, we can ALSO infer that Y << X (we just don't know how Y relates to Z). So, if we know that Z << X, we can ALSO infer that Y << X (we just don't know how Y relates to Z).
  
 +So unless we can find an example that violates this case, we can run with it as a viable approach to take in the letter division puzzles. Tell me: is there a valid combination that violates this?
 =====Less than number certainties===== =====Less than number certainties=====
 Like the above, but inverted: what if we KNOW that the top number is less than one of the two numbers beneath it? Can we also infer some pattern? Let's see: Like the above, but inverted: what if we KNOW that the top number is less than one of the two numbers beneath it? Can we also infer some pattern? Let's see:
haas/fall2019/c4eng/projects/pctxinfo.1566660541.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/08/24 15:29 by wedge