3c6801a74ffb88e483c9d5ce9f5580212205fcaf
haas/spring2026/comporg/projects/dap0.md
| ... | ... | @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ |
| 1 | +# CSCS2650 Computer Organization |
|
| 2 | + |
|
| 3 | +# PROJECT: DEBUG AND POLISH (dap0) |
|
| 4 | + |
|
| 5 | +## OBJECTIVE |
|
| 6 | + |
|
| 7 | +Create a simple debugging output routine to help investigate issues in |
|
| 8 | +program logic. |
|
| 9 | + |
|
| 10 | +## GRABIT |
|
| 11 | + |
|
| 12 | +There is a GRABIT available, containing some skeleton code, an XML file, |
|
| 13 | +and a Makefile, that will facilitate building the cartridge. |
|
| 14 | + |
|
| 15 | +## TASK |
|
| 16 | + |
|
| 17 | +Implement a Vircon32 assembly subroutines that displays the 32-bit |
|
| 18 | +hexadecimal value of an indicated item to the display at a provided set |
|
| 19 | +of coordinates (supplied via the stack). |
|
| 20 | + |
|
| 21 | +Specifically, you want to call the subroutine **`_debug`**, and place it |
|
| 22 | +in a file called **`debug.s`** so that you can **`%include`** it as |
|
| 23 | +needed in your debugging efforts. |
|
| 24 | + |
|
| 25 | +It is written entirely in Vircon32 assembly language, using no |
|
| 26 | +compiler-generated routines from the Vircon32 API (no **print**, no |
|
| 27 | +**itoa**)- you want to create whatever supporting routines are needed. |
|
| 28 | + |
|
| 29 | +Pass 3 parameters via the stack: |
|
| 30 | + |
|
| 31 | + * value to display (first added) |
|
| 32 | + * X coordinate (second added) |
|
| 33 | + * Y coordinate (third added) |
|
| 34 | + |
|
| 35 | +Be sure to preserve all register and important system states (ie whatever |
|
| 36 | +was going on before the call to debug must be preserved: save and |
|
| 37 | +restore) |
|
| 38 | + |
|
| 39 | +Make use of the stack instructions **PUSH** and **POP**, although all |
|
| 40 | +stack access does not have to exclusively be via **PUSH** and **POP**. |
|
| 41 | + |
|
| 42 | +Utilize bitwise logic in the process to convert each nibble of data into |
|
| 43 | +the value/region you will display |
|
| 44 | + |
|
| 45 | +Try it out on some existing code, posting a screenshot (with context) to |
|
| 46 | +the class discord. |
|
| 47 | + |
|
| 48 | +Provide usage instructions (what needs to be added to existing code to |
|
| 49 | +use your debug subroutine) |
|
| 50 | + |
|
| 51 | +## SUBMISSION |
|
| 52 | + |
|
| 53 | +To be successful in this project, the following criteria (or their |
|
| 54 | +equivalent) must be met: |
|
| 55 | + |
|
| 56 | + * Project must be submit on time, by the deadline. |
|
| 57 | + * Late submissions will lose 33% credit per day, with the submission window closing on the 3rd day following the deadline. |
|
| 58 | + * Processing must be correct based on input given and output requested |
|
| 59 | + * Output, if applicable, must be correct based on values input |
|
| 60 | + * Code must be nicely and consistently indented and aligned |
|
| 61 | + * Code must be consistently written, to strive for readability from having a consistent style throughout |
|
| 62 | + * Code must be commented |
|
| 63 | + * Sufficient comments explaining the point of provided logic **MUST** be present |
|
| 64 | + * Track/version the source code in your private semester repository |
|
| 65 | + * Submit a copy of your source code to me using the **submit** tool by the deadline. |
|
| 66 | + |
|
| 67 | +## SUBMIT TOOL USAGE |
|
| 68 | + |
|
| 69 | +Let's say you have completed work on the project, and are ready to |
|
| 70 | +submit, you would do the following (once on LAB46, with all your data |
|
| 71 | +present): |
|
| 72 | + |
|
| 73 | +``` |
|
| 74 | +lab46:~/src/SEMESTER/comporg/dap0$ make submit |
|
| 75 | +``` |
|
| 76 | + |
|
| 77 | +You should get some sort of confirmation indicating successful submission |
|
| 78 | +if all went according to plan. If not, check for typos and or locational |
|
| 79 | +mismatches. |
|
| 80 | + |
|
| 81 | +### RUBRIC |
|
| 82 | + |
|
| 83 | +I'll be evaluating the project based on the following criteria: |
|
| 84 | + |
|
| 85 | +``` |
|
| 86 | +182:dap0:final tally of results (182/182) |
|
| 87 | +*:dap0:submitted file called debug.s or debug.asm [13/13] |
|
| 88 | +*:dap0:subroutine is called _debug or __debug [13/13] |
|
| 89 | +*:dap0:code assembles with no warnings or errors [13/13] |
|
| 90 | +*:dap0:parameters obtained via the stack [26/26] |
|
| 91 | +*:dap0:register states preserved across call [13/13] |
|
| 92 | +*:dap0:debug subroutine uses the stack [26/26] |
|
| 93 | +*:dap0:process utilizes bitwise logic [26/26] |
|
| 94 | +*:dap0:screenshot of subroutine in action to discord [13/13] |
|
| 95 | +*:dap0:code contains usage instructions in comments [13/13] |
|
| 96 | +*:dap0:output contains display of contents at coordinates [13/13] |
|
| 97 | +*:dap0:functionality is correct and to specifications [13/13] |
|
| 98 | +``` |
|
| 99 | + |
|
| 100 | +### ADDITIONALLY |
|
| 101 | + |
|
| 102 | + * Solutions not abiding by spirit of project will be subject to a 50% overall deduction |
|
| 103 | + * Solutions not utilizing descriptive why and how comments will be subject to a 25% overall deduction |
|
| 104 | + * Solutions not utilizing indentation to promote scope and clarity or otherwise maintaining consistency in code style and presentation will be subject to a 25% overall deduction |
|
| 105 | + * Solutions not organized and easy to read (assume a terminal at least 90 characters wide, 40 characters tall) are subject to a 25% overall deduction |