Corning Community College CSCS2320 Data Structures ======PROJECT: Lists - Doubly-Linked Lists of Nodes (DLL1)====== =====OBJECTIVE===== To continue our journey on doubly-linked data structures, and collaboratively authoring and documenting the project and its specifications. =====OVERVIEW===== We continue now delving into the realm of doubly-linked data structures. This project: we complete on our doubly-linked list implementation. =====UPGRADING===== To assist with consistency across all implementations, project files for use with this project, along with the integration of the work you did on the last project, is made possible via a special recipe in the Makefile. Simply go into the project base directory, and run: lab46:~/src/SEMESTER/DESIG/prevPROJECT$ make upgrade-dll1 =====EDIT===== You will want to go [[/notes/data/fall2022/projects/dll1|here]] to edit and fill in the various sections of the document: * [[/notes/data/fall2022/projects/dll1|https://lab46.g7n.org/notes/data/fall2022/projects/dll1]] {{page>notes:data:fall2022:projects:dll1&nouser&nodate&nomdate}} =====SUBMISSION===== To be successful in this project, the following criteria (or their equivalent) must be met: * Project must be submit on time, by the deadline. * Late submissions will lose 33% credit per day, with the submission window closing on the 3rd day following the deadline. * All code must compile cleanly (no warnings or errors) * Compile with the **-Wall** and **--std=gnu18** compiler flags * all requested functionality must conform to stated requirements (either on this document or in a comment banner in source code files themselves). * Executed programs must display in a manner similar to provided output * output formatted, where applicable, must match that of project requirements * Processing must be correct based on input given and output requested * Output, if applicable, must be correct based on values input * Code must be nicely and consistently indented * Code must be consistently written, to strive for readability from having a consistent style throughout * Code must be commented * Any "to be implemented" comments **MUST** be removed * these "to be implemented" comments, if still present at evaluation time, will result in points being deducted. * Sufficient comments explaining the point of provided logic **MUST** be present * No global variables (without instructor approval), no goto statements, no calling of main()! * Track/version the source code in your lab46 semester repository * Submit a copy of your source code to me using the **submit** tool (**make submit** on lab46 will do this) by the deadline. ====Submit Tool Usage==== Let's say you have completed work on the project, and are ready to submit, you would do the following: lab46:~/src/SEMESTER/DESIG/PROJECT$ make submit You should get some sort of confirmation indicating successful submission if all went according to plan. If not, check for typos and or locational mismatches. =====RUBRIC===== I'll be evaluating the project based on the following criteria: 91:dll1:final tally of results (91/91) *:dll1:obtained project by the Sunday prior to duedate [13/13] *:dll1:clean compile, no compiler messages [13/13] *:dll1:implementation passes unit tests [26/26] *:dll1:adequate modifications to code from template [13/13] *:dll1:program operations conform to project specifications [13/13] *:dll1:code tracked in lab46 semester repo [13/13] ===Pertaining to the collaborative authoring of project documentation=== * each class member is to participate in the contribution of relevant information and formatting of the documentation * minimal member contributions consist of: * near the class average edits (a value of at least four productive edits) * near the average class content change average (a value of at least 256 bytes (absolute value of data content change)) * near the class content contribution average (a value of at least 1kiB) * no adding in one commit then later removing in its entirety for the sake of satisfying edit requirements * adding and formatting data in an organized fashion, aiming to create an informative and readable document that anyone in the class can reference * content contributions will be factored into a documentation coefficient, a value multiplied against your actual project submission to influence the end result: * no contributions, co-efficient is 0.50 * less than minimum contributions is 0.75 * met minimum contribution threshold is 1.00 ===Additionally=== * Solutions not abiding by spirit of project will be subject to a 50% overall deduction * Solutions not utilizing descriptive why and how comments will be subject to a 25% overall deduction * Solutions not utilizing indentation to promote scope and clarity or otherwise maintaining consistency in code style and presentation will be subject to a 25% overall deduction * Solutions not organized and easy to read (assume a terminal at least 90 characters wide, 40 characters tall) are subject to a 25% overall deduction